04.09.2018
PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING
APRIL 9, 2018
City of Nacogdoches Planning Department
202 E. Pilar – PO Box 635030 – Nacogdoches, TX 75963
936-559-2502 Fax 936-559-2912 www.ci.nacogdoches.tx.us
Home of Stephen F. Austin State University www.sfasu.edu
THE NACOGDOCHES CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL MEET IN REGULAR
SESSION, MONDAY, April 9, 2018, AT 5:00 P.M. IN THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER ROOM 119 AT
202 EAST PILAR STREET TO CONSIDER:
1. Call to Order.
2. Approval of Minutes: Minutes from March 12, 2018 Regular Session
3. Staff Presentation:
I. Discussion on tree preservation in the City of Nacogdoches.
II. Discussion on SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) Analysis for future planning
projects.
4. Staff Announcements
5. Adjourn:______________
_________________________________
Jerri Turner, Planning Assistant
The City Council Chambers is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for
accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please cont act the City Planning
Department at (936) 559-2571 or FAX (936) 559-2910 for further information.
CERTIFICATION
I certify that the above notice was posted on the public notice board at City Hall, 202 East Pilar Street, on Wednesday April 4, 2018 at
3:00 p.m. I further certify that the News Media were properly notified of this meeting as stated above.
______________________________________
Jerri Turner, Planning Assistant
I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Planning & Zoning Commission was removed by me from
the directory outside City Hall on the _______ day of _____________________, 2018.
Name: _____________________________ Title:_______________________________________
P&Z Minutes Page 1
MINUTES TO THE
PLANINNG AND ZONING BOARD
March 12, 2018– 5:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
Members Present: Matt Turner, Jay Anderson, Stephanie Malott, R.J. Bohac
Members Absent: Don Mills
Staff Present: Leo Mantey, Jerri Turner, Nick Domovich
Others Present: Jeff Opperman, Glorine Gregory, Jeff Reed, Becky Reed, Tim
Howell, Kerri Deckard, Lyn Howell, Stephanie Jones.
1. Call to Order: Commissioner Turner opened the meeting and called it to order at 5:07
p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes: December 11, 2017 Regular Session:
Commissioner Anderson made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner Bohac
seconded the motion and the motion passed unanimously (4-0)
3. Introduction of the new City of Nacogdoches, Director of Planning, Leo Mantey.
Planning Assistant, Ms Jerri Turner, introduced, Mr. Leo Mantey to the board. He then
took over the meeting.
Planning Director, Mr. Leo Mantey stated that this is his 4th week here with the City of
Nacogdoches and that he was looking forward to working with the board as well as the
other boards and citizens of the community.
Agenda Item #4: Public Hearing: Please consider the request for a n approval of the
preliminary plat for the Deckard Subdivision, Lots 10 -1/2-B, Part of Lot 10-B-2, and
Part of Lot 10-B-6, Block 62, located on Lamar and Sutton Streets. This request was
submitted by Opperman Surveying.
Planning Director, Leo Mantey, explained this request. He stated this is a Preliminary plat
located in the north eastern part of Nacogdoches. It is within a built out subdivision. It is a
stretch of land with four structures on it. The applicant wishes to divide the property to put
each structure on its own lot. It is not in the floodplain, and there are no issues with
drainage or utility access. Staff recommends approval of the plat because it meets all the
subdivision and platting requirements.
Commissioner Bohac stated that this is a stretch of land with four houses on it.
Mr. Mantey stated yes, and said the platting will bring the land in conformity to city
regulations. He stated that each house would have its own driveway.
Commissioner Anderson asked if there were any plans for the developing lot 5.
Ms Kim Deckard stated that she lives on Lamar Street. Possibl y in the future, they would
sell the 5th lot and maybe eventually construct a house per the zoning regulations.
P&Z Minutes Page 2
Ms Stephanie Jones stated that she lives at 415 Hasley and wants to make sure this is
not affecting her property in any way.
Mr. Opperman the applicant, assured her that it would not affect her property in any way.
It is basically just cleaning up the lot lines and assigning each house to a lot.
Chairman Turner asked if there was anyone to speak for or against. There were none. He
called for a motion.
Commissioner Anderson made a motion to approve the request. Commissioner Malott
seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously. (4-0)
Agenda Item #5: Public Hearing: Please consider a request for an approval of the
preliminary plat of the Jeff Reed Subdivision, Lots 4 & 5, Block 2, of the Idylwild
Addition and Lots 1-L & 1-L1, Block 54, located on Colonial Drive and Walnut
Streets. This request has been submitted by Opperman Surveying.
Director of Planning, Leo Mantey, explained this request. He stated this is a three (3) lot
subdivision in a built out residential neighborhood. The site is currently made up of four
lots. The purpose of this subdivision plat is to reconfigure the lot lines in order to create
access for the landlocked lot located at the rear of the properties, or to improve the
accessibility and circulation in the subdivision. There are currently three homes on site
and they will remain as is.
All the lots conform to the subdivision regulations stipulated for the R -1 zoning district
Commissioner Bohac asked if it was just a cleanup issue.
Mr. Mantey answered in the affirmative and stated that they are making sure all lots have
accessibility.
Mr. Jeff Opperman, the applicant, stated this is a unique situation. The triangular lot would
be sold to Tim Howell. They are cleaning up the area to reconfigure the lot for Mr. Howell.
Chairman Turner asked if there was anyone to speak for or against. There was no further
discussion. He called for a motion.
Commissioner Bohac made a motion to approve the request. Commissioner Anderson
seconded the motion. It was approved passed unanimously (4-0).
Staff comments and updates:
Director of Planning, Leo Mantey, stated that he wanted to thank everyone for the
welcome. He stated that he would like to see this city move forward. He stated to the
board that he is a facilitator and open to any ideas or suggestions from the board and
citizens that will help move the city forward.
Mr. Mantey explained that the city is in the process of applying for a Scenic City
Certification. He stated that the mission of the Scenic City Certification Program is to
support and recognize Texas municipalities that implement high -quality scenic standards
for public roadways and public spaces. The Scenic City Certification Program provides a
P&Z Minutes Page 3
proven, highly-regarded tool to Texas cities for assessment, evaluation and recognition of
infrastructure standards
Commissioner Bohac asked what the cost would be.
Mr. Mantey stated it would be $749.00 for application and the results would be out in mid
July.
Commissioner Malott asked if the application is annual.
Mr. Mantey stated that it is renewed every five years and also there is a $300.00 fee to
upgrade the certification to the next level. He stated that is not required but encouraged.
Commissioner Bohac stated that basically it’s having a 3rd party come in and review.
Mr. Mantey replied in the affirmative.
Secondly, Mr. Mantey also stated that he has met with a citizen who is proposing a “tiny
house” concept within the city limits. It is targeted to be used for in-fill development, and
might possibly consider senior citizens. The project may involve 40 houses with paved
parking and driveways and landscaping. The developer would manage the property and
do all the upkeep. Mr. Mantey asked the board if they thought it would work.
Commissioner Bohac stated he would worry about traffic and infrastructure.
Commissioner Anderson stated that he owns a tiny house as rental property and would
like to see how this would be designed.
Chairman Turner asked how you the rental would be managed to ensure it blend well in
the neighborhood.
Commissioner Bohac stated that overseeing and maintaining the property by the owner
would help.
Mr. Mantey stated that he has advised the citizen to do one and two bedrooms.
Ms Becky Reed stated that she and her husband are building a small home. She stated
there is the need to ensure that ADA requirements and specifications are put in place
before approval.
Mr. Opperman stated the city should consider issues with overcrowding, especially with
the city being a college town.
Mr. Mantey thanked everyone for their contribution and stated he will like to have regular
workshops with the P&Z Commission.
P&Z Minutes Page 4
Agenda Item #5: ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 6:00pm
_________________________________
Chairman, Matt Turner
_________________________________
Attest: Jerri Turner, Planning Assistant
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING
AGENDA ITEM 3-I
DISCUSSION ON TREE PRESERVATION IN THE CITY OF
NACOGDOCHES
City of Nacogdoches
202 E. Pilar – PO Drawer 635030 – Nacogdoches, TX 75963
936-559-2571 Fax 936-559-2910 www.ci.nacogdoches.tx.us
Home of Stephen F. Austin State University www.sfasu.edu
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM # 3-I
FROM: The Office of the Director of Planning
DATE: April 09, 2018
DISCUSSION ON TREE PRESERVATION IN THE CITY OF NACOGDOCHES.
Background
Visitors and residents new to Nacogdoches are always fascinated and appreciative at the extensive woodlands
parklands, and pocket forests which occupy the region. This has been achieved through a collaborative effort between
citizens, city staff, elected and appointed officials and all stakeholders. Most city ordinances help to preserve trees
and the natural environments due to the fact that, they are written based on the fundamental principles of sound urban
forest management, diversification, preservation, and replenishment.
In recent months there have been discussions by city management and citizens on the need to discuss whether a
tree preservation ordinance will be worth considering especially considering the increase in growth within the
city in the past years. Currently, it looks like there is no cause for alarm with regards to tree preservation.
However there is the need to consider future occurrences which might happen as a result of a major boost in the
city economy that might propel rapid development in both commercial and residential areas. It is the desire of
every city to experience growth physically and economically, it is also pertinent that the natural environment
and other unique features be preserved while experiencing these positive growths.
Staff believes tree preservation has a lot of benefits for citizens and the natural environment and has undertaken
research on how Tree Preservation Ordinances have worked in other cities. Staff hopes to start discussion on
this and see if it is needed in the City now or in the future.
Action by Planning and Zoning Commission
1. Discuss the importance/possible threats associated with Tree Preservation within the City, and consider
the next step moving forward.
2. Any other action deemed necessary.
Attachments:
1. Tree Preservation Facts
Tree Conservation Facts
Trees and forests cover nearly one-third of the earth’s surface, according to the United Nations
Environmental Program World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Trees beautify the landscape, remove
pollutants from the air and create the oxygen we breathe. That’s why maintaining sustainable
management of both natural and planted trees remains important to tree conservation efforts. One way to
help tree conservation is to add trees to the landscape and gardens that surround our everyday lives.
Environmental Benefits
To restore and maintain soil and water resources while removing 25 percent of the carbon in our
atmosphere, the World watch Institute estimates the planet needs at least 321 million acres of trees. In the
United States alone, forests take up 745 million acres of land. Yet, some forests keep diminishing,
including the rainforests where 1.5 acres of forest are lost each second.
Economic Benefits
Trees provide more than 5,000 products that make our lives more comfortable, including nuts, fruits, oils,
medicine and wood for household goods and construction. According to North Carolina State University,
a person uses wood and paper products each year equivalent to a 100-foot tall tree with an 18-inch trunk.
The processing, manufacturing and distribution of these products provides jobs for many people. As long
as forests are replanted, the trees will provide jobs and economic benefits.
Local Uses
Gardeners and landscapers find trees invaluable for shading buildings on hot summer days, eliminating a
need for extra energy for cooling. Trees can be used as windbreaks along borders, fences or yards,
keeping snow and damaging winds to a minimum. Trees also beautify the landscape, especially in cities
where they integrate nature into urban areas.
Endangered
According to a survey by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, more than 8,000 tree species
remain threatened with extinction. This represents nearly 10 percent of all tree species.
Wildlife
Wildlife depends on trees for shelter, food and temporary habitat. Birds also rely on certain trees for food,
nesting locations and shelter. Even dead trees help wildlife, such as woodpeckers, squirrels and other
small mammals that use the cavities for shelter and raising their young.
Medicinal
The rainforest contains a wealth of trees and plants that may prove useful for medicinal purposes. More
than 25 percent of Western medicine comes from rainforest ingredients, yet only 1 percent of the trees
and plants are further tested to determine other benefits. Pharmaceutical companies research rainforest
trees in hoping of finding cures to life-threatening diseases.
Source : https://www.gardenguides.com/114375-tree-conservation.html
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MEETING
AGENDA ITEM 3-II
DISCUSSION ON SWOT
(STRENGTHS,WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES,
AND THREATS) ANALYSIS FOR FUTURE
PLANNING PROJECTS.
City of Nacogdoches
202 E. Pilar – PO Drawer 635030 – Nacogdoches, TX 75963
936-559-2571 Fax 936-559-2910 www.ci.nacogdoches.tx.us
Home of Stephen F. Austin State University www.sfasu.edu
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEMORANDUM
AGENDA ITEM # 3-II
FROM: The Office of the Director of Planning
DATE: April 09, 2018
DISCUSSION ON SWOT (STRENGTHS, WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES, AND THREATS)
ANALYSIS FOR FUTURE RANGE PLANNING PROJECTS.
Background
A SWOT analysis is a term used to describe a tool that is effective in identifying the Strengths and Weaknesses,
and for examining the Opportunities and Threats you face. While it is a basic, straightforward model, it has
been a popular practice for many years because it helps provide direction and serves as a basis for the
development of current and future planning initiatives.
It accomplishes this by examining the strengths (what a city does well or possesses) and weaknesses (what city
does not do well or lacks) in addition to opportunities (potential favorable conditions to be harnessed) and
threats (potential unfavorable conditions for an operation)
The planning department has a list of current and long range planning initiatives which includes: updating the
comprehensive plan, improving north/south street aesthetics, consider a possible overlay district, master
planning for undeveloping areas in the inner city and a host of other plans that are all geared towards improving
living conditions and enhancing the overall image of the City of Nacogdoches.
Since resources are scarce, staff will like to have a discussion with the P&Z commission on the strengths and
potential opportunities that currently exist which can be harnessed to promote the aforementioned long range
plans. Also we will discuss the problems and threats that must be overcome in order to ensure sustainability and
effectiveness, as well as to promote cost saving activities in future planning projects.
Action by Planning and Zoning Commission
1. Discuss the broad Strengths and Weakness of the City of Nacogdoches and consider how they contribute
to the future plans of the Planning Department.
2. Any other action deemed necessary.
Attachments:
1. SWOT Analysis Facts
WHAT ARE THE ELEMENTS OF A SWOT ANALYSIS
The list below gives a general description of the SWOT analysis. However for the purpose of our
discussion, our emphasis will be city government. Thus what exist or is being done by the city. What
services or functions are being done or should be potentially done by the city. Our discussion will look
at factors that will relate to, and help create policies or plans for future planning initiatives.
Strengths
The first element of a SWOT analysis describes the strengths of an operation. These strengths include
what an operation does well, and should be viewed from both your point of view as well as the point of
view of people with whom you come in contact. In some cases, an organization’s strengths are obvious,
for example, being a low cost producer. If you have trouble determining your strengths, start by simply
listing your community’s attributes (e.g. location, size, parks, and recreational opportunities). What are
its assets, benefits and/or advantages? What do you/your organization(s) do well? What have you
accomplished?
Weaknesses
The other internal element of the SWOT analysis describes the weaknesses of an operation. Examining
weaknesses include identifying what an operation does not do well. As with the stre ngths, weaknesses
should be examined from both your perspective and from the perspective of those outside your operation.
It is also possible for weaknesses to be obvious such as a limitation of resources or be more of a
perspective issue such as a lack of teamwork. What can you/your organization do to improve? What is
done poorly? What areas are not covered?
Opportunities
The first external element of the SWOT analysis is opportunities. The opportunities include any favorable
situation in the business’s environment that the operation may realize gains from. These could range from
diversification and the use of new technologies to market trends and relationship developments. It is
important to note that all operations have some opportunities: identifying these opportunities is the sign of
a good analyst. What are the opportunities facing you and your organizations? What are the
opportunities you might choose to pursue? What trends can you take advantage of?
Threats
The final element of the SWOT analysis is the external threats that the operation faces. Regardless of size
or profitability, all operations face threats. These threats could range from lower international prices to
key relationships that are not going well. Whatever the threat, the operation should have a plan in place to
resolve the problem. What obstacles do you/your organization face? Are the requirements needed to
address issues changing? What is holding your organization back?