Loading...
P&Z Agenda Packet 11-29-2021 (Special Mtg)Nacoadoche the oldest town in Texas Planning & Zoning Commission November 29, 2021 Notice is hereby given of a Special Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to be held on November 29, 2021 at 3:00 p.m., via videoconference, with the opportunity to appear in person in the Council Chambers, Room 119 of City Hall, 202 E. Pilar Street, Nacogdoches, Texas, for the purpose of considering the following agenda items. All agenda items are subject to action. The City of Nacogdoches Planning & Zoning meeting will be deemed as being conducted via teleconference or videoconference. However, some Board Members may attend virtually, while others may be present in the above stated physical location. Regardless, the meeting will be streamed live at www.ci.nacogdoches.tx.us/21. There will be an opportunity for the public to comment on agenda items either by teleconference or in person in Council Chambers. Members of the public who wish to submit comments on a listed agenda item in writing or via teleconference must contact the Planning & Zoning office by email at Iewisr('Onactx.us or by calling 936-559-2574 and providing their name, telephone number and relevant agenda item upon which they wish to speak. All requests to make comments via teleconference must be received by 12:00 p.m. on Monday, November 29, 2021. For all timely requests received, staff will call the submitted phone numbers directly during the meeting when the corresponding item comes up for comment. NOTE: The incoming phone call from City staff will be an unfamiliar number. PLEASE LIMIT PRESENTATIONS TO THREE MINUTES (UNLESS PRIOR APPROVAL IS OBTAINED) 1. Call to Order. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Open Forum: In addition to public comment on agenda items, the Commission offers an open forum whereby citizens may comment on governance issues over which the City of Nacogdoches has domain. In accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, members of the Commission shall not discuss, deliberate, or make any decisions on topics not posted as an agenda item. Speakers should address all remarks to the Commission and limit your remarks to no more than 3 minutes. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include final plats where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to City of Nacogdoches Planning Department 202 E. Pilar St. — PO Box 635030 — Nacogdoches, TX 75963 936-559-2574 -1 Fax 936-559-2912 n www.nactx.us Home of Stephen F. Austin State University - www.sfasu.edu Nacoadoche the oldest town in Texas address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If any Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. a. Approval of Minutes: Consider approval of minutes from the November 8, 2021 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting. 5. REGULAR AGENDA: a. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. b. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Letter of Support to update the Nacogdoches Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Master Plan. 6. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items: A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. 7. Adjourn: Rhonda Lewis, Office Assistant II The City Council Chambers is wheelchair accessible and accessible parking spaces are available. Requests for accommodations or interpretive services must be made 48 hours prior to this meeting. Please contact the City Planning Department at (936) 559-2574 or FAX (936) 559-2910 for further information. CERTIFICATION I certify that the above notice was posted on the public notice board at City Hall, 202 East Pilar Street, on Wednesday, November 24, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. I further certify that the News Media were properly notified of this meeting as stated above. Rhonda Lewis, Office Assistant II I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Planning & Zoning Commission was removed by me from the directory outside City Hall on the day of , 2021. Name: Title: City of Nacogdoches Planning Department 202 E. Pilar St. — PO Box 635030 — Nacogdoches, TX 75963 936-559-2574 -1 Fax 936-559-2912 n www.nactx.us Home of Stephen F. Austin State University - www.sfasu.edu MINUTES TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION November 8, 2021— 5:00 p.m. Hybrid Meeting Members Present: Ken Deppisch, Don Mills, Lily Phou, Ruth Carroll Members Absent: Shannon Conklin Staff Present: City Planner, Alaina Helton; Office Assistant, Rhonda Lewis; and Planning Technician, Juan Pollette Others Present: Matt Moore, David Connolly, Warren Sparks, Charles Wheeler, Brad Maule, Mario Torres, Mable Cannings, Margaret Forbes, & Anne Keehnen 1. Call to Order: Chairman Deppisch called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. 2. Pledge of Allegiance. 3. Open Forum: Chairman Deppisch welcomed comments to the open forum. There were none. 4. Work Session: City Planner Helton made a presentation regarding `comprehensive planning & community visioning' as the first installment of a community educational series on planning topics. The presentation covered the elements of a comprehensive plan update and the planning process for community outreach and action. There was general discussion among the Commission regarding the Nacogdoches Comprehensive Plan Update, including: the consultant's experience; online public engagement; elements to be included in the Plan; changes in the city's growth pattern; where the current Plan falls short; and, the frequency of future Plan updates. 5. Open Forum: Chairman Deppisch opened the floor for public comment on the Work Session. Matthew Moore addressed the Commission and gave suggestions on implementing the current 2003 Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Moore mentioned his monetary donation to the City to add resources to the library to study and learn about the planning process. Mr. Moore also recommended that the City delay updating the Plan to do more upfront work on engaging the community. Chairman Deppisch closed the open forum. 6. Consent Agenda: All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered routine by the Commission and will be enacted by one motion. These items include final plats where staff has found compliance with all minimum subdivision regulations. All items approved by Consent are approved with any and all staff recommendations. Since there will not be separate discussion of these items, citizens wishing to address the Commission regarding one or more items on the Consent Agenda may address the Commission at this time as well. If a Commissioner desires to discuss an item on the Consent Agenda it may be moved to the Regular Agenda for further consideration. a. Approval of minutes: October 11, 2021 Regular Session Commissioner Mills made a motion to approve the minutes as written. Commissioner Carroll seconded the motion and the minutes were approved unanimously (4-0). 7. Regular Agenda: a. Consideration, discussion, and possible action on items removed from the Consent Agenda by Commission action. P&Z Minutes Page 1 b. Public Hearing: Consider a request for approval of a Concept Plan for a PD, Planned Development District for Lots 1, 1-A & 1-B, City Block 64, located at 2827 Railroad Street. This request has been submitted by Warren Sparks. Case File PD2021-04. City Planner Helton presented the item and recommended approval of the proposed Planned Development district and the Concept Plan. Chairman Deppisch asked if the screening around the Contractor Yard is required by Ordinance. City Planner Helton stated yes. A Contractor Yard has an aesthetic requirement to screen from the adjacent properties. Chairman Deppisch asked if the details on the agreement for shared maintenance of Railroad Street were finalized. City Planner Helton stated no. However, the Engineering Dept. agrees to this condition as part of the Concept Plan, should it be approved. Commissioner Phou asked how expensive the cost for street maintenance would be and if the tax revenue from the business would sustain the cost; also, if the new development plan would accommodate the changing traffic in the area. City Planner Helton stated that some minor repairs to the street had already occurred, and future evaluation will be conducted of the costs of repairing the street and the impact of the planned development will have on the area. Ms. Helton stated that the applicant is proposing to share the costs of the street repair and maintenance. The applicant, Warren Sparks, addressed the Commission and stated that he had looked at other properties to rent, but the cost is too expensive. Mr. Sparks stated that he had been in business for eighteen years at that location and did not want to phase the business out right away as it is his livelihood and is not at retirement age. Mr. Sparks stated that the existing equipment on the property is primarily used for parts, and that he has changed the exhaust systems on six trucks. He also stated he is willing to do anything required to help the City to fix any potholes on the street. Chairman Deppisch inquired about the phase out of the planned development, and if it was gradual or if it would be from fully operational to closing up shop at some point. Mr. Sparks stated that it would be gradual over a 10-year period. He also stated that he is looking into another location to move the business within the 10-year period. Chairman Deppisch asked if Mr. Sparks could explain what he proposed to put up as a screen along Railroad Street. Mr. Sparks stated he would plant shrubs, and possibly some type of mesh fence, and that all the large equipment will be moved to the north side of the property. Chairman Deppisch opened the floor to the public comment. David Connolly addressed the Commission and read from his email sent in opposition of the request. Mr. Connolly stated he does not believe that his primary complaint of the dump trucks leaving at early hours and causing loud noises would be enforced. Mr. Connolly suggested placing a camera on the road to monitor the early morning hour traffic or placing a fence around his own home might remedy the problem. Mr. Connolly expressed his concerns about future maintenance of Railroad Street and a hump in the street located in front of his property. Mr. Connolly also expressed his concerns about the applicant complying with the conditions of the Planned Development. P&Z Minutes Page 2 Chairman Deppisch inquired about the hump in the road in front of Mr. Connolly's home and stated that this is something that could be addressed in the shared street maintenance agreement proposed by the applicant. Commissioner Phou asked about the timing for the installation of the proposed fence and screening around the outdoor storage area and along Railroad Street. City Planner Helton stated that the construction drawings for the plantings and fencing should be submitted immediately upon approval of the PD Development Plan, which is the second phase of the planned development process. Chairman Deppisch and Commissioner Phou asked City Planner Helton if a camera would be placed to monitor road traffic. City Planner Helton stated that if the City was made aware of a violation of the conditions of the Planned Development in regards to the truck schedule, that the City has cameras that could monitor the roadway traffic in this area. Chairman Deppisch asked if there any further public comments. Mr. Sparks addressed the Commission and stated that he and his staff have never had an accident on Railroad Street and that his staff is instructed to report any near misses. Chairman Deppisch asked Mr. Sparks if he is selling any of the fill dirt on his property. Mr. Sparks answered no. There was discussion amongst the Commission and Chairman Deppisch made a motion to approve the Planned Development district and Concept Plan with the following conditions: 1. As part of the shared maintenance agreement of Railroad Street, the applicant will repair the hump located in the right-of-way immediately in front of the residence located at 2620 Railroad Street. 2. A 6-foot mesh screening fence will be installed along the southern boundary of the property to block the views of commercial activity from the existing residents located on the south side of Railroad Street. Commissioner Phou seconded the motion and the request was approved unanimously (4-0). 8. Discussion and possible action on future agenda items: A Planning & Zoning Member may inquire about a subject for which notice has not been given. A statement of specific factual information or the recitation of existing policy may be given. Any deliberation shall be limited to a proposal to place the subject on an agenda for a subsequent meeting. Chairman Deppisch thanked City Planner Helton for the educational series and stated that he looked forward to the next one. 9. Adjourned: Meeting was adjourned at 7:14. Chairman, Ken Deppisch Attest: Juan Pollette, Planning Technician P&Z Minutes Page 3 Nacoadoche the oldest1�n towin Texas PRESENTER: Alaina Helton, AICP, City Planner Planning & Zoning Commission Date: November 29, 2021 Agenda Item: 5.b ITEM/SUBJECT: Consideration, discussion, and possible action on a Letter of Support to update the Nacogdoches Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Master Plan. Summary: The action before the P&Z Commission is to send a letter in support to the City Council to move forward to hire a consultant to create a Downtown Master Plan, and update the City's Comprehensive Plan, which would also incorporate a Housing Needs Assessment and an I-69 Corridor Plan. Background: In December, 2020 and January, 2021 staff presented a list of long-range studies and strategies to the City Council that would assist the City in creating long-term, strategic action -plans to help further current and future planning, engineering and economic development efforts. Based on input received from City Council at these work sessions, staff was directed to move forward with the advancement of these initiatives, including conducting the procurement process of the following two proposals: Hire a consultant to create a Downtown Master Plan; and, Hire a consultant to update the City's Comprehensive Plan, which would also incorporate a Housing Needs Assessment and an I- 69 Corridor Plan. The Downtown Master Plan This Plan would create a vision for Downtown Nacogdoches and act as a framework for future ordinances and initiatives with strategies to help reinvigorate the downtown area. This plan would also include a market analysis to explore how much, and what type of new retail, entertainment, and housing that exists, and may be needed in the years ahead. A design plan for the downtown area was last completed in 1974. The Comprehensive Plan Update, I-69 Corridor Plan & Housing Needs Assessment The Comprehensive Plan Update includes three (3) different studies, and would include a review of current conditions of land uses, recommend future land uses, a future transportation plan, and implementation strategies. The update would include an I-69 Corridor Plan, with in-depth study of the proposed I-69 Corridor, which would include more specific future land use, utility, and design suggestions. The update would also incorporate a Housing Needs Assessment, which would include a review of the City's current housing stock and project housing needs for the near and long term. The Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2003. Benefits of These Studies • Change - Current plans identify new issues as they emerge while others no longer remain relevant. 0 Maintain Relevance - Ensure the Plan continues to reflect the overall goals of the community. • Public Support - Periodic review and community feedback is an opportunity to affirm the public's ownership of the Plan remains strong. CITY CONTACT: Alaina Helton, AICP, Director of Planning & Neighborhood Services heltona@nactx.us (936) 559-2572 ATTACHMENTS: Support Letter Fact Sheet Naco doches the oldest town in Texas Nacogdoches Planning & Zoning Commission November 29, 2021 City Council City of Nacogdoches P.O. Box 635030 Nacogdoches, TX 75963 Via email: mizejPnactx.us, belangerkPnactx.us, fischeraPnactx.us, andersonj P nactx.us, boldonrPnactx.us RE: Support to update the Nacogdoches Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Master Plan Dear Mayor & City Council The Nacogdoches Planning & Zoning Commission supports the update to the Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Master Plan. These Plans will give our city the tools to adopt and refine development ordinances, utility capital improvement plans, and other public services to best take advantage of our strengths and opportunities, while protecting against threats. The current Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2003, in an environment vastly different than the one we live in 2021. Nacogdoches' demographics, development patterns, and economy are different than they were 20 years ago, and cell phones, email, online shopping, and social media were all in their infancy. These technologies have changed the way we live and work in our community, and a modern Plan will reflect these changes. Growth and development will be accelerated by the continued work to upgrade Hwy 59 to I-69. The I-69 Corridor plan component of the Plan update will give the city the tools to plan for the needed infrastructure to support development along this corridor. The creation of development standards for this corridor is also important, as it will become the face of Nacogdoches for tens of thousands of drivers each day. Nacogdoches is also struggling with a lack of single family housing, particularly due to the lack of new residential subdivision development. The housing assessment included in these studies is necessary to identify what kinds of housing are needed, project those needs for the future, and provide solutions to encourage housing development in ways supported by the residents of Nacogdoches. Downtown is the jewel of Nacogdoches and having a current Master Plan will help this asset reach its highest potential while ensuring proper preservation is maintained. For these reasons, the Nacogdoches Planning & Zoning Commission supports the update to the Comprehensive Plan and Downtown Master Plan. Sincerely, Ken Deppisch P&Z Commission Chair City of Nacogdoches cc: City Manager Mario Canizares, canizaresmPnactx.us, & City Secretary Jan Vinson, vinsonj onactx.us Nacogdoches Downtown Master Plan and Comprehensive Plan Update SUMMARY City Council has directed Staff to move forward with the procurement process for the following two proposals: Hire a consultant to create a Downtown Master Plan; and, Hire a consultant to update the City's Comprehensive Plan, which would also incorporate a Housing Needs Assessment and an 1-69 Corridor Plan. BACKGROUND In December 2020, and January 2021, city staff presented a list of long-range studies and strategies to the City Council that would assist the City in creating long-term, strategic action - plans to help further current and future planning, engineering and economic development efforts. Based on input received from City Council at these work sessions, staff was directed to move forward with the advancement of these initiatives, including conducting the procurement process to hire a consultant to create a Downtown Master Plan and to update the City's Comprehensive Plan, which would also incorporate a Housing Needs Assessment and an 1-69 Corridor Plan. PROJECT SCOPE The Downtown Master Plan This Plan would create a vision for Downtown Nacogdoches and act as a framework for future ordinances and initiatives with strategies to help reinvigorate the downtown area. This plan would also include a market analysis to explore how much, and what type of new retail, entertainment, and housing exists, and may be needed in the years ahead. A design plan for the downtown area was last completed in 1974. The Comprehensive Plan Update, 1-69 Corridor Plan & Housing Needs Assessment The Comprehensive Plan Update includes three (3) different studies, and would include a review of current conditions of land uses, recommend future land uses, a future transportation plan, and implementation strategies. The update would include an in-depth study of the proposed 1-69 Corridor, including future land use, utility, and design suggestions. The update would also incorporate a Housing Needs Assessment, which would include a review of the City's current housing stock and project housing needs for the near and long term. The Comprehensive Plan was last updated in 2003. SUPPORT It is normal to do an entire rewrite/update of a comprehensive plan every 20 years or so. Nacogdoches' demographics, development patterns, and economy are vastly different than they were 20 years ago when the current comprehensive plan was written. To put it in perspective, at the time the current plan was written, the dot -corn bubble had just burst, smartphones didn't exist, and social media was in its infancy. Why it is important to update the plan instead of just continuing along with the existing 2003 Plan: • The bulk of the work hours to update a plan will be contained in the demographic projections, analysis of current conditions, market analysis, and updating of the future land use, utility and transportation plans. There are good recommendations in the 2003 Plan, and any recommendations still found to be valid after exposing them to 2021 conditions and public review, will remain. • The 2003 Plan was drafted in an environment vastly different than the one we live in 2021. Cell phones, email, online shopping and mapping, and social media were all in their infancy. The development of these technologies has changed the way citizens are engaged, allowing segments of the population to be reached that have never before been engaged. Equally as important, those technologies have changed the way we live and work in our community. A modern comprehensive plan will reflect those changes technology has produced in our community. Benefits of These Studies: • Change: Current plans identify new issues as they emerge while others no longer remain relevant. a Maintain Relevance: Ensure the Plan continues to reflect the overall goals of the community. • Public Support: Periodic review and community feedback is an opportunity to affirm the public's ownership of the Plan, remains strong. OPPOSITION The current proposal may seem relatively expensive when compared to other cities' expenditures on comprehensive plans because it contains extensive public engagement, beyond what other cities may have requested. The City Council has emphasized public involvement and requested the comprehensive plan process include a great deal of public input. This public involvement, while worthy, is expensive. Heavy public engagement in the comprehensive plan process will not only ensure the concerns and desires of all of the community's residents are heard, but it also provides an opportunity to bring the community together and hopefully find some common ground. While SFA has many experts in a variety of fields, SFA does not have the expertise to prepare a municipal comprehensive plan. A comprehensive plan needs a team of professional planners, engineers, economists, and marketing specialists. While SFA may have some of those experts, those SFA faculty and staff certainly do not have the time to complete this process as volunteers. SFA administration is supportive of the process, but has not volunteered to complete the plan. Several of those opposed to the plan have indicated the money should instead be spent on infrastructure. The $450,000 for the comprehensive plan is dwarfed by the infrastructure needs. Directing this money to infrastructure construction will not make a significant impact on Nacogdoches' infrastructure needs. A long term capital improvements plan that identifies future utility upgrades and maintenance is the logical next step after a comprehensive plan outlines the future growth and infrastructure demands of the community. FOR MORE INFORMATION Alaina Helton City of Nacogdoches City Planner heltona@nactx.us (936) 559-2572 Jessica Sowell City of Nacogdoches Historic Sites & Main Street Manager sowelli@nactx.us (936) 560-4441